Connect with us


Why abrogation of Article 370 under the scanner of SC

Read about the SC’s scrutiny of the abrogation of Article 370 in this insightful article. Gain a deeper understanding of Article 370 and its significance.



Article 370

Read about the SC’s scrutiny of the abrogation of Article 370 in this insightful article. Gain a deeper understanding of Article 370 and its significance.

Follow Us


Article 370 was a significant provision in the Indian Constitution that granted a special status to the region of Jammu and Kashmir. It granted considerable autonomy to the state and defined the relationship between the Indian government and the state of Jammu and Kashmir. However, on August 5, 2019, the Indian government, led by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Prime Minister Narendra Modi, took a bold and unprecedented step by abrogating Article 370, effectively revoking the state’s special status. This decision sparked widespread debate and controversy, leading to multiple petitions challenging the abrogation filed in the Supreme Court.

Understanding Article 370

Article 370 was a temporary provision inserted into the Indian Constitution under Part XXI, which dealt with “Temporary, Transitional, and Special Provisions.” It was included to acknowledge the unique circumstances surrounding the accession of Jammu and Kashmir to India in 1947. The article defined the relationship between the Indian government and the state of Jammu and Kashmir, providing special provisions that granted the state substantial autonomy and special privileges. Key features of Article 370 included:

Autonomy: Article 370 granted the state of Jammu and Kashmir a high degree of autonomy. The state had its own constitution and flag, and its residents enjoyed dual citizenship, which meant they were subject to their own laws, except in matters related to defense, communications, foreign affairs, and finance.

Restricted application of Indian laws: Many central laws passed by the Indian Parliament did not automatically apply to Jammu and Kashmir. The state had the power to decide which laws to adopt and which to reject, except those related to the areas mentioned above.

Separate citizenship: Residents of Jammu and Kashmir enjoyed certain privileges, such as the right to own property and seek government jobs in the state.

Special status for women: Article 35A, which derived from Article 370, empowered the state’s legislature to define “permanent residents” and grant them special rights and privileges, particularly with regard to property rights and government jobs. However, this provision was also challenged and struck down in 2019 by the Supreme Court of India before the abrogation of Article 370.

Also read: Mission Chandrayaan-3

The Significance of Article 370

Historical Context: Article 370 was a result of the unique circumstances under which Jammu and Kashmir became a part of India. The Maharaja of Kashmir, Hari Singh, signed the Instrument of Accession in 1947, agreeing to accede to India. To respect the state’s autonomy, Article 370 was incorporated, and it formed the bedrock of the state’s relationship with the Indian Union.

Political Significance: The abrogation of Article 370 was a highly contentious political move. For decades, it was a matter of ideological debate between those who argued for preserving the state’s special status and those who believed it hindered its full integration into the Indian Union. The abrogation decision by the Indian government was seen as a bold step towards further integration of Jammu and Kashmir into the rest of India.

National Security: The abrogation was also seen as a measure to enhance national security and counter-insurgency in the region. Proponents of the decision argued that the special status had led to separatism and hindered the enforcement of uniform laws, which impacted the state’s development and security.

Social and Economic Implications: The abrogation aimed to promote economic development and investment in the region. Critics, however, expressed concerns that the move might lead to demographic changes and dilute the cultural identity of the region.

Supreme Court’s Role and the Petitions

As expected, the abrogation of Article 370 led to legal challenges, with several petitions being filed in the Supreme Court questioning the government’s decision. The Supreme Court, as the highest judicial body in India, plays a crucial role in interpreting and upholding the Constitution. The court’s primary responsibility is to determine whether the abrogation of Article 370 was constitutionally valid and whether it adhered to the principles and procedures outlined in the Constitution.

The Court is tasked with evaluating the government’s justification for the abrogation, the historical context, and the implications of the decision on the people of Jammu and Kashmir. The Justices have the important responsibility of balancing the interests of national integration, security, and development with the preservation of regional autonomy, cultural identity, and human rights.


The abrogation of Article 370 has been one of the most significant and controversial decisions in India’s history. The Supreme Court’s role in hearing and deciding on the multiple petitions challenging this decision is of immense importance. The Court’s verdict will not only shape the future of Jammu and Kashmir but will also set important precedents for the interpretation of the Indian Constitution and the delicate balance between regional autonomy and national integration. As the nation awaits the Supreme Court’s ruling, it is essential to respect the principles of justice, democracy, and the rule of law in the pursuit of a just and equitable resolution.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *